Thursday, September 11, 2008

O mi gosh!

Coming from uni, I've been ingrained with two opinions on wiki's:
1. Good way to share knowledge. Is a way for the internet to be 'user-centered'.
2. Not a liable enough resource for essays and assignments.
Hearing the latter, I asked 'why that might be?', and apparently its because wiki's can be opinion-based as opposed to being fact. Rather then go into the whole issue as to whether this is a good thing/bad thing, I'll let you know my few experiences:

Wiki's are cool. Yeah, it might potentially lean towards an 'opinion-based' information, but it's still information. Information that can be dissected and studied to be seen if it can be 'fact'. I was on the

'Programs for Kids & Teens'

wiki, and found it an encouraging piece to read knowing that other librarians out there also experience the struggle of putting books into kids & teens hands (or more specifically, into 'boys' hands lol). I was also on , and although I haven't gone through it extensively, it will be awesome to look for programs that work with other teens around the world!

So yeah, although the information I saw wasn't always 'fact' but more or less 'experiences', it can still be a starting point for my line of work, because when you work with kids and teens who perceive reading as a "waste of time sir!", you're bound to need ideas to help turn around such perceptions!

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

*nothing* was here


Hahaha mean lesson. Have always been able to manipulate images before using paint (and pretty good at it), but this is something new - easier and faster. I've only tried 'Letter James' and it is awesome! The graffiti image is mean!!! The only downside however is that you only redefine the text onto an a predetermined image. (Maybe I need to register with it to do a little bit more). I'll give the other 2 resources a go when at home as my computer doesn't seem to open the first one, and being a librarian, there a lot of work to be done (books to shelve haha)

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Catch up time...

Damn how the time and date are displayed for when the posts are done. Then, I could've been "eatz"(lied) and said I have been consistent in my web 2.0 learning. However, as the date suggests, I haven't touched this thing in ages, but hey, 'feeds', adding to the 'favourites' is are things I'm already familiar with (to a point lol).

Way behind, but I reckon I can come back. Oh... in regards to the lesson, I've only subscribed to 4 feeds. The minimum is 10, but the computer is acting very slow, so I'll find the last 6 later on... honest! (Or am I being 'eatz'? haha)

Thursday, July 17, 2008

1st blog...

Questions: "Feel free to share what worked for you … and what didn’t … what surprised you … what frustrated you … what amazed you."

Answers: "Everything seems to be working fine. No glitches here Alfred" ... "The struggle is my identity. Am I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _? Or _ _ _ _ _ _? Oh, but in regards to this bloggin' stuff, everything's fine so far" ... "No surprises yet. My knowledge of web 2.0 is fair, so I'm good for now" ... "Frustrations? Nada... well, not yet anyway" ... "Amazed me? Never had a blog before, so this is pretty amazing."